CRM-M-25712-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125 CRM-M-25712-2025 Date of decision: 12.05.2025 Gurdeep Singh ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and Ors. ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner (through VC). ***** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J.(ORAL) Present petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, is for issuance of directions for conducting a free and fair investigation into the complaints and taking action against the respondent as per law/representations dated 31.03.2025 and 13.04.2025 as respondent Nos. 2 to 4 is not investigating the matter. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is an Indian citizen and permanent resident of Denmark. The petitioner was residing at Denmark along with his wife Rekha and minor child Gursher Singh. On 06.03.2025, wife of the petitioner had some dispute with the petitioner over some minor issue and she left the home along with minor child and contacted a Crisis Centre at District Naerum, Denmark, where they were given temporary accommodation. Thereafter, the Crisis Centre referred the matter to Family Court, District Naerum, Denmark. The petitioner’s wife on advise by her relatives, relocated the minor child from the petitioner’s lawful custody to India, without informing the Crisis Centre or the present petitioner who is father of the minor child. Jyoti 2025.05.13 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-25712-2025 -2- He urged that petitioner and his minor son who are Indian citizens are permanent resident of Denmark whereas wife of the petitioner is on spouse visa and petitioner tried to know the whereabouts of his wife and minor child from his in-laws , who refused to divulge any details about the child and his wife. On 12.03.2025, the petitioner appeared before Family Court at Naerum Denmark and he was allowed temporary custody of child. Petitioner had submitted various representations to police authorities in Punjab including representation dated 31.03.2025 to ADGP NRI, Punjab Police and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, through official e- mails, but he failed to get any response. He submits that wife of the petitioner has taken minor child Gursher Singh to India without petitioner’s knowledge, consent, or approval in total disregard to the law as prevailing in Denmark. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he would be satisfied, in case, the pending representation (Annexure P-3) is decided by respondent No.3. Notice of motion. Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice and submitted that she has no objection if the aforesaid representation dated 13.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) is decided. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3, to look into the representation (Annexure P3) and to take appropriate action, if any required, at the earliest. Disposed of. 12.05.2025 (SUKHVINDER KAUR) jyoti3 JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No Jyoti 2025.05.13 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document