APHC010143162003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25393 of 2003 Bench Sr.No:- 22 [3506] Shaik Abdul Hai & Another ...Petitioner(s) Vs. The Chairman, Rayalseema Grameena Bank ...Respondent ********** Advocate for Petitioners: Sri M V RAJA RAAM Advocate for Respondents: Smt.V UMA DEVI CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 4th December 2025 ORDER: On 13.11.2025, as there was no representation for the petitioners, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” on 20.11.2025. On 20.11.2025 and on 27.11.2025, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, it was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 2. Smt.V.Umadevi, learned counsel for the respondents, is present. 2 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date:04.12.2025. cs