Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5261 (GAU)

NIBHA PATHAK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS

WP(C)/29/2023 · 2025-01-26

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010001072023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/29/2023 NIBHA PATHAK W/O BINOD PATHAK, R/O VILL-RAMPUR, MOUZA-OPAKA, P.S.- SARTHEBARI, DIST-BAJALI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEPARTMENT DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN-781006 2:TEH COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEPARTMENT ASSAM PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-781037 3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BAJALI ZILA PARISHAD BAJALI ASSAM 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BHAWANIPUR ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT SARUPETA ASSAM 5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BHAWANIPUR DEV BLOCK SARUPETA 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Page No.# 2/3 BAJALI ASSAM 7:THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER BAJALI ASSAM 8:THE VICE PRESIDENT 9 NO. PUB PAKA GAON PANCHAYAT WARD NO. 2 9:RANJIT PATHAK EX-IN-CHARGE G.P. SECRETARY 9 NO. PUB PAKA GAON PANCHAYAT UNDER BHAWANIPUR DEV. BLOCK SARUPETA 10:SANATAN BARMAN PRESENT SECRETARY OF 9 NO. PUB PAKA GAON PANCHAYAT UNDER BHAWANIPUR DEV. BLOCK SARUPETA 11:TAPAN TALUKDAR VICE-PRESIDENT 9 NO. PUB PAKA GAON PANCHAYAT UNDER BHAWANIPUR DEV. BLOCK SARUPET Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S B CHOUDHURY, M DAS,MR. S K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., M DAS (R-8),M DAS (R-10),GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 27.01.2025 None appears for the petitioner, Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat and Rural Development is present. Mr. S. R. Barua, learned Government Advocate, appears for Respondents No. 6 and 7. Page No.# 3/3 It is submitted by Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development, that the term of the panchayat in question had come to an end in the month of February, 2024, and accordingly, no further live issue arises for consideration by this Court in the present proceeding. However, there being no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant