1 (VS,J C.C.No.3042 of 2024) APHC010309782024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3042/2024 Between: 1. NAMBURI RAJ KUMAR, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO AGED 43 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-8, PRAGATI COLONY, SOUTH BY-PASS ROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI B ARJUNA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED MAJOR, OCC PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. MS KONDA KEERTHI, D/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED MAJOR, OCC THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER THALLURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SRI K KANNA BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED MAJOR, OCC COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful, wanton, and deliberate violation of the judgment of this Hon'ble Court dated 23.08.2023 made in WP No.21239 of 2023 and pass such 2 (VS,J C.C.No.3042 of 2024) IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with my personal appearance on 10.12.2024 in the above C.C.No.3042 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2. B V APARNA LAKSHMI 3. The Court made the following: 3 (VS,J C.C.No.3042 of 2024) JUDGMENT: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.21239 of 2023 on 23.08.2023, wherein this Court passed the following order: “...4. In view of the said circumstance, instead of keeping this Writ Petition pending, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department to consider the case of the petitioner in pursuance of the order passed in C.C.No.343 of 2015 dated 10.01.2023, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs..” 2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the present Contempt Case, the respondents have considered the petitioner’s representation dated 23.06.2023 and passed necessary orders on 02.09.2025. Hence, he prays that the Contempt Case may be closed. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Contempt Case shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date : 07.11.2025 RPD. 4 (VS,J C.C.No.3042 of 2024) THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA (CLOSED) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3042 OF 2024 Date: 07.11.2025 RPD.