SRI SHIRDI SAI BABA SANKESHEMA SEVA SANGHAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/25333/2023 · 2025-10-12
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52600 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52600 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010489032023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25333/2023 Between:
1. SRI SHIRDI SAI BABA SANKESHEMA SEVA SANGHAM, , AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM,
REGISTERED UNDER SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1860, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI KONATHALA REVATHI RAO, S/O LATE K RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCUPATION. BUSINESS,R/O D.NO. 49-35-17/1, NGGO'S COLONY, OPP VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE AND METROPOLITAN COMMISSIONER, FOR VMRDA VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. THE COMMISSIONER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, ZONE-V, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.
5. THE CHIEF CITY PLANNER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2
6. THE ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER, ZONE-V, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M V S ANIL KUMAR R Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
2. K MADHAVA REDDY
3. GP FOR REVENUE
4. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
The petitioner filed the present writ petition apprehending the demolition of the Temple which was constructed in the layout.
2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for GVMC submits that no steps have been taken for any demolition and that, as on date, the Temple stands undisturbed. Any further proposal for acquisition of the petitioner’s property shall be in accordance with law.
3. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 13.10.2025 PNS