IN THE H PULKIT GUPTA A STATE OF PUNJA CORAM : HO HO Present : Mr Mr DEEPAK SIBA Le of the petitioner 18.07.2025 pass Singh Vs. State In dismissed in term 01.04.2026 Prince Whether speakin Whether reporta Sr. No.117 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CWP-216 Date of D TA AND ORS Versus UNJAB AND ORS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocat Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Pu *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties ar itioners is to be dismissed in the light 5 passed by a Coordinate Bench in . State of Punjab and others. In the light of the aforesaid c in terms of Harvinder Singh’s case (su (DEEPAK JU (LAPITA JU speaking/reasoned : Yes/No reportable : Yes/No JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH 21693-2025 te of Decision : 01.04.2026 …PETITIONERS …RESPONDENTS EPAK SIBAL PITA BANERJI ocate for the petitioners. ., Punjab. ties are in agreement that the case e light of a recent judgment dated h in CWP-9172-2025-Harvinder said consensus, this petition is ase (supra). EPAK SIBAL) JUDGE PITA BANERJI) JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2026.04.02 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document