APHC010221212021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No: 1070 Between: 1. GUNTAKA KALAVATHI, W/O VENKATANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.IMMADICHERUVU VILLAGE, VELIGANDLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 1. JWALA NARASIMHA RAO, WORKING AS TAHSILDAR, VELIGANDLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Ms.V.SOWMYA for Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. Mr.P. SUBASH 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No: 1070 of 2021 GUNTAKA KALAVATHI, W/O VENKATANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.IMMADICHERUVU VILLAGE, VELIGANDLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND JWALA NARASIMHA RAO, WORKING AS TAHSILDAR, VELIGANDLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms.V.SOWMYA for Mr.K. JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3209] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA GUNTAKA KALAVATHI, W/O VENKATANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.IMMADICHERUVU VILLAGE, VELIGANDLA ...PETITIONER JWALA NARASIMHA RAO, WORKING AS TAHSILDAR, VELIGANDLA ...CONTEMNOR 2 The Court made the following: The present Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the orders dated 05.02.2021 passed in W.P.No.2741 of 2021. The relevant portion of which reads as follows: “As already the petitioner made a detailed representation, the 5th respondent is directed to take appropriate action on the said representation in accordance with law after giving due opportunity to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” At the time of considering the matter, the learned counsel representing the respondent submits that the representation of the petitioner was considered and the same was rejected vide Proceedings dated 30.06.2021. The relevant portion of which reads as follows: “As per para 5 (b) of proceedings of the Joint Collector, Ongole issued in D.Dis.E2/3177/2010 dated 25.06.2019 in respect of cases covered by Annexure- II, for which the Suo-moto revision is disallowed. The RDO, Kandukur shall conduct diligent enquiry and submit detailed report to the Joint Collector, in respect of each individual with specific grounds and evidence, for taking up the case for Suo-moto revision u/s of the A.P.Rights in Land and PPPBs Act, 1971. But the enquiry is not yet completed. In view of the above, it is not possible to remove orange colour to the landed property measuring an extent of Ac.18.00 cents in Sy.No.50 of Immadicheruvu Village, Veligandla Mandal. Hence the petition is hereby rejected.” In view of the above stated position, the Contempt Case does not survive for adjudication and the same is Closed. Needless to observe that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said proceedings, it is open to her to avail 3 the remedies in accordance with Law. No costs. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J Date: 13.11.2025 BLV 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA C.C.No.1070 of 2021 Dt: 13.11.2025 BLV 5