Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5258 (UTT)

RAMPAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1109/2025 · 2025-05-19

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1109 of 2025 (M/S) Rampal ..….....Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….….Respondents Present:- Mr. Avidit Noliyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, Deputy Advocate General for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Petitioner claims that his application for issuance of caste certificate for OBC category has wrongly been rejected. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the Government Order, the petitioner is entitled to caste certificate, but he is denied such certificate. He would submit that the petitioner has already made a representation dated 03.12.2024 (Annexure No. 11 to the writ petition), which is still pending. 4. Learned State Counsel would submit that the petitioner had not deposited the necessary documents required for issuance of certificate; therefore his application was rejected. He would submit that now the petitioner’s representation may be decided within a period of six weeks. 5. The Court takes on record the statement made by the learned State Counsel. 2 6. In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the Tehsildar, Tehsil Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 03.12.2024 (Annexure No. 11 to the writ petition) within six weeks from today. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 19.05.2025 Avneet/