JITENDRA KUMAR MEENA S/O BIRJU MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1432/2025 · 2025-02-13
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5258 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5258 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6354] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1432/2025 Jitendra Kumar Meena S/o Birju Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 607, Peer Baba Ke Pass, Khandeep, Thana Vajipur, District Gangapur City Hal Sawai Madhopur Raj. (Presently Accused Is Confined In Central Jail, Karoli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 13/02/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.214/2024 registered at Police Station Mahaveer Ji, District Karauli for the offence(s) under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged quantity of smack recovered from the possession of petitioner is 14 gram 70 mgm, which is below commercial quantity. There is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long. The trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application may be allowed.
[2025:RJ-JP:6354] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1432/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the alleged quantity of smack recovered from the petitioner is below commercial quantity and petitioner is not having criminal antecedents. The trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Jitendra Kumar Meena S/o Birju Meena, in connection with FIR No.214/2024 registered at Police Station Mahaveer Ji, District Karauli shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/273