APHC010068902019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2025 In/and CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 270/2019 Between: 1.G.MOSES, D.NO. 19-15-25, CHINAPET, BHIMAVARA-1, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND 1.S VENKATA RAJU, D.NO. 27-1-7/2, J.P.ROAD, PRIYANKA BHAVAN, BHIMAVARAM, W.G.DIST 2.THE STATE OF AP, HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARAVATHI ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MOTUPALLI VEERANNA ABBAI TATA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 COMMON ORDER Petitioner and Respondent No.1 are present. 2. A receipt bearing No.360 dated 24.11.2025 has been filed by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner stating that an amount of Rs.11,250/- has been paid to the A.P. High Court Legal Services Committee towards 7.5% costs of the cheque amount as per the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar1. 3. I.A.Nos.1 & 2 are filed and the same are allowed, permitting the Respondent No.1 to compound the offence with the Petitioner. In the result, Petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ The judgment dated 27.02.2019 in Crl.A.No.114 of 2018 passed by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Bhimavaram is set aside. Petitioner/Accused is acquitted. 4. It is pertinent to mention that cheque amount is Rs.4,50,000/-. Whereas the Respondent No.1 and the Petitioner have agreed to compromise the matter and agreed to receive Rs.1,50,000/- from the Petitioner/Accused towards full and final settlement of the dispute between the Petitioner and Repsondent No.1. Therefore, the Petitioner has volunteered to pay 7.5% of the amount agreed for compromise. 5. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Sanjabij Tari v. supra that a case may be compromised at the High Court level in revision upon payment of 7.5% of the cheque amount to the Legal Services Authority, and considering that the required costs have been paid, the Criminal Revision 1 Criminal Appeal No.1755 of 2010 3 Case is accordingly disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 24.11.2025 VTS