Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52569 (AP)

P. Rajagopal, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/11430/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010199872021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 11430/2021 Between: 1. P. RAJAGOPAL, S/O.HANMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O.BOODAGAVI VILLAGE, URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, URAVAKONDA POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. K GANESH, S/O.BRAHMACHARI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 5. K DIVAKAR, S/O.VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT D.NO.28/558, I TOWN, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3' respondent in interfering a civil dispute between the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 the land in Sy.No.34 an extent of Ac.02.50 cents situated at Malapuram Village, Vidapanakallu Mandal, Anantapur District and without jurisdiction is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of the natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in a civil dispute IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station with regard to the land in Sy.No.31 an extent of Ac.02.50 cents situated at Malapuram Village, Vidapanakallu Mandal, Anantapur District 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. KRISTAM SAKTHI NIRANJAN GUPTHA 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner seeking the following relief: “... to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3' respondent in interfering a civil dispute between the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 the land in Sy.No.34 an extent of Ac.02.50 cents situated at Malapuram Village, Vidapanakallu Mandal, Anantapur District and without jurisdiction is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of the natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in a civil dispute....” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that there are civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and the unofficial respondents and that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 11430 of 2021 14.10.2025 Mjl /*