1 APHC010520972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26947/2025 Between: 1. MATETI ADINARAYANA, S/O SIMHACHALAM AGED 56 YEARS, PROP OF JAGADISH AGENCIES, C/O KAREEM COMPLEX, SHOP NO.5 AND 6, D.NO. 12-8-9/5 AND 6, HYDER SAHEB STREET, TARAPET, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, L/O, WEST ZONE, VIJAYAWADA-NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA-NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONE-TOWN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA-NTR DISTRICT. 5. GUNNAM RAMA KRISHNA, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED 58 YEARS OCC ADCP, LAW AND ORDER, WEST ZONE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLA N.V.L.NARAYANA ADITYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ Order of direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents specifically respondent nos.2 and 5 in trying to vacate the petitioner from shops bearing no's.5 & 6 of Kareem Complex located at Dr.No.12-8-9/5 & 6, Hyder Saheb Street, Tarapet, Vijayawada of NTR District and thereby threatening the petitioner to implicate into false in the event of not vacating the said premises and further calling the petitioner to the respondent office and thereby abusing the petitioner with filthy language as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principle of natural justice and colorable exercise of power and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner and his business activities in any manner what so ever and also pass such other order and orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard Sri Pilla N.V.L. Narayana Aditya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of the unofficial respondent No.5 herein, the petitioner was called to the Police Station for preliminary enquiry and no crime has been registered. 4. Recording the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.10.2025 Vns