Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52555 (ALL)

VIQAR HAIDER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

CRLP/8946/2025 · 2025-05-05

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72800-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8946 of 2025 Petitioner :- Viqar Haider Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhijeet Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. 2. The instant writ petition is preferred under Article 226 Constitution of India inter-alia with following reliefs:- (I) Issue a writ, order, rule or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 and 3 to conduct the enquiry in the matter and take appropriate illegal action upon the respondent no. 4 to 7 for their misconduct and manipulation in original documents by changing the date of birth." 3. After substantial argument, once the court has declined to interfere in this matter, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to invoke the remedy as available in law. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say, in case the petitioner is aggrieved, hey may avail the remedy as available in law. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 6.5.2025/Mukesh Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad