APHC010170772024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10915/2024 Between: 1. KILO SATTIBABU, S/O CHENNAIAH, AGE 55 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 2. GUNTACHINNARAO, S/O UTTARA, AGE 38 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 3. . VANTHALA RAJU, S/O RAMA RAO, AGE 36 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 4. GEMMELA CHINNA, S/O RAMA RAO, AGE 40 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 5. GEMMELA CHINNA, S/O SHAKUNAM, AGE 38 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 6. GEMMELA NAGESH, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGE 29 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 7. GEMMELASEENU, S/O SUBBASE RAO, AGE 28 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 8. . GUNTA SRINIVAS RAO, S/O CHINNA RAO, AGE 30YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 9. VANTHALA SRINU, S/O S/O RAJU, AGE28 YEARS. 30 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 10. PANGI SURESH, S/O PRASAD, AGE 28YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 11. .GEMMELA BABU RAO, S/O SAMME, AGE 31 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. 12. GEMMELA RAM, S/O SAMME, AGE 26 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION. ALL ARE BELONGING TO KODU COMMUNITY, R/O CHERUKUMPALEM PANCHAYATHI, SANNJEEVINAGAR, RAJAVOMMANGI RANGE FOREST, RAMPACHODAVARM DIVISION, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS . PRINCIPAL .SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINDENTENDENT OF POLICE, , PADERU, ALLURI 2 SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICTFOREST OFFICER, AT KAKINADA. KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P S JEDDANGI, RAJAVOMMANGI MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DIST 5. THE FOREST SECTION OFFICER, CHEMKUMPALEM, RAJAVOMMANGI MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT. 6. THE FOREST BEAT OFFICER, JEDDANGI, RAJAVOMMANGI MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT. 7. THE FOREST RANGER, RAJAVOMMANGI MANDAL, ALLURI SETHARAMARAJU DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M CHALAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR FORESTS The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents no 2 and 4 in not taking any action on the complaint of petitioners on 29-02-2024. and not even registering an FIR or causing any enquiries in terms of the judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lalitha Kumari Vs State of U.P, as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the complaint lodged by the petitioners on 29- 02-2024 and to register FIR.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the Police have not received any complaint or representation from the Petitioner. 3. None represented for the Petitioner. 3 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to approach the Police and make a fresh representation, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10915 of 2024 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh