KUSHAGRA MEENA S/O LATE SHRI VINOD KUMAR MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1717/2025 · 2025-03-07
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5255 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5255 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:10665] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1305/2025 Anuj Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Lachchhi Ram Gurjar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Chauhanpura Ebra Tehsil Boli, Police Station- Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur Hall Flat Number 311, Block- B, Ashirwad Apartment, Police Station Sanganer, Jaipur East. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1717/2025 Kushagra Meena S/o Late Shri Vinod Kumar Meena, Aged About 20 Years, R/o House No. 365, Ward No. 17, Nasiya Colony, Near Naveen School, Gangapur City, P.s. Kotwali, District Sawai Madhopur, At Present- Flat No. 311, Block B, Ashirwad Apartment, P.s. Sanganer, Jaipur East (Raj.). (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain Mr. Mritunjay Sharma for Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 07/03/2025
1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.26/2025 registered at Police Station
[2025:RJ-JP:10665] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1305/2025] Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences under Section 309(4) of BNS.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submit that false allegations have been levelled against the petitioners. It is submitted that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel contend that petitioners have no criminal antecedents and they are in custody since
17.01.2025. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also considering the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; petitioners have no criminal antecedents and they are in custody since 17.01.2025; trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications.
6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioners (1) Anuj Kumar Gurjar S/o Shri Lachchhi Ram Gurjar, & (2) Kushagra Meena S/o Late Shri Vinod Kumar Meena, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the
[2025:RJ-JP:10665] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1305/2025] sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in once in every three months in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded.
8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /374-375