A R K INFRA AVENUES INDIA PVT LTD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/33537/2025 · 2025-12-04
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52542 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52542 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010647272025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33537/2025 Between:
1. A R K INFRA AVENUES INDIA PVT LTD, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S SAI SRINIVASA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT D.NO.50-96-12/C, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR PENUMATSA RAMA SUBHRAMANYAM RAJU, S/O APPAL RAJU.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISHAKHAPATNAM, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. NEELI APPARAO, S/O LATE PRAKASHA RAO R/O D.NO.10-13, SRINIVASANAGAR, FLAT NO. 105, MK VIHAR, KOMMADHI JUNCTION, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM-48
4. NEELI BANGARA RAJU, S/O LATE PRAKASHA RAO, R/O D.NO.20- 113 SWATANTRA NAGAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM-48
5. NEELI TATA RAO, S/O LATE PRAKASHA RAO, R/O D.NO.10-67/4/1, SAI RAM COLONY, KOMMADHI JUNCTION, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM
2
6. MOTURI PADMA, W/O SRI M. BABU RAO, R/O D.NO. 18-34-26/1, TADI VEEDHI, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530002.
7. JAKKALANKI RAJESWARI, W/O J. SANYASI RAO, R/O D.NO.44-34- 60, NANDAGIRI NAGAR, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-
530016.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:
3
Order:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 05.12.2025 PNS