Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52541 (KAR)

SMT. KADADUR MALLAMMA, W/O LATE KADADUR BHEEMAPPA v. SRI. KADADUR RUDRA GOUDA, S/O KADADURGOVINDNA GOUDA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS

RSA/101145/2023 · 2025-02-17

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO.101145 OF 2023 BETWEEN SMT. KADADUR MALLAMMA, W/O LATE KADADUR BHEEMAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O BENAKAL VILLAGE, BELLARY TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT (BY SMT. GAYATRI S.R. ADV.) AND SRI. KADADUR RUDRA GOUDA, S/O KADADURGOVINDNA GOUDA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS SMT. MALLAMMA W/O. LATE KADADURRUDRAGOUDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O BENEKAL VILLAGE, TALUK AND DISTRICT BALLARI AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS RSA FILED U/SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.10.2022 PASSED IN R.A.NO.28/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BALLARI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.04.2015 PASSED IN O.S. NO.120/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SECOND ADDITIONAL SENIOR 2 CIVIL JUDGE, BALLARI, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Finally, three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE Note: As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 24.03.2025, the Advocate for the Appellant has not complied office objection. Hence, this above matter stands dismissed without reference to the Bench for non- prosecution as per the Court Order dated:17.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: cmu C- By: sgs