Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 52541 (BOM)
DILIP S/O PRALHADRAO DESHMUKH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
MCA/349/2025 · 2025-09-19
Shri Raj D Wakode, Smt M S Jawalkar
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52541 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52541 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
904 mca 349-2025.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.349/2025 Dilip s/o Pralhadrao Deshmukh Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri R.J. Shinde, Advocate for applicant CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.
DATED : 19.09.2025
1. Heard Shri R.J. Shinde, learned Counsel for the applicant.
2. The present application is filed by the applicant for restoration of the present First Appeal, which was dismissed in default on 05.08.2005 for non depositing the deficit Court fee. The reasons stated for doing so are in paragraph Nos.4 and 5 of the present application. In view of the aforesaid reasons, the present application is allowed.
3. The appellant undertakes to supply the deficit Court fee within one week.
4. After the deficit Court fee is deposited by the appellant, the Registry to restore the present First Appeal No.529/1996 to the file of this Court.
5. Accordingly, the Civil Application is disposed of.
(RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) R.S. Sahare