Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 52540 (BOM)
SACHIN S/O SURESH SHELKE AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF MHA. THR. PSO PS GITTIKHADAN NAGPUR AND ANOTHER
APL/1172/2022 · 2025-02-25
Shri Nitin B Suryawanshi, Shri Pravin S Patil
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52540 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52540 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 18.apl.1172.2022 IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1172 OF 2022 Sachin s/o Suresh Shelke and ors. ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Pratik Patle, Advocate for non-applicant no.2. Mrs. Deshmukh, Addl.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 25/02/2025. Though served, none appears for the applicants.
2. It appears that applicants are repeatedly remaining absent and they are not engaged any Counsel.
3. The application, is therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL
, J.
) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI
, J. )
Trupti