APHC010952392017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 41525/2017 Between: 1. SRI. C V P NARAYANA,, S/O. KOTAIAH, AGE: 70 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 203, VIGNESWARA TOWERS, ANJANEYA PETA, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PRASAR BHARATHI CORPORATION, REP., BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRASAR BHARATI HOUSE, COPERNICUS MARG, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR DOORDARSHAN KENDRA, RAMANTHAPETC, HYDERABAD. 3. DRAWING DISBURSING OFFICER, PRASAR BHARATHI (BCI), DOORDARSHAN KENDRA, RAMANTHAPUR, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the 2 action of the respondents more particularly the action of the respondents no. 2 and 3 in not issuing a revised Form 16 A under Income Tax Act for the tax deducted at source amounts or refund of the income tax deducted during the financial year 2010- 2011 from the royalty amounts paid to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and fair play IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 51503 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to dispose of the representations made by the petitioner to issue revised Form 16 A under Income Tax Act for the tax deducted at source amounts or refund of the income tax deducted during the financial year 2010-2011 from the royalty amounts paid to the petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V CHALAPATHI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT 3 The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner died on 06.10.2018. 2. Since the prayer in the writ petition relates to deduction of income tax for the financial year 2010-11, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 17.11.2025 ANS 4 192 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 41525/2017 Dated: 17.11.2025 ANS