Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121828-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 218 of 2025 Applicant :- Dharm Pal Opposite Party :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Mishra,Jai Shanker Misra,Vijai Shanker Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. The instant review application has been filed contending that the construction of the petitioner existed over the acquired land before the notification under Section 3A of National Highways Act, 1956 and that it was also duly included in the award but at the time of drawing Naksha 11, some mistake has occurred on account of which name of the petitioner was omitted and, in his place, name of Madho son of Chhatar, his real brother, came to be mentioned and he has wrongly withdrawn the amount.
2. Madho was not party to the writ proceedings. Moreover, the dispute, in view of the submission made, would be that of apportionment.
3. We have already noted the stand of the competent authority that, in case, NHAI supplies any fresh report alongwith compensation, the competent authority would have no objection in releasing the amount. This, in our opinion, amply safeguards the interest of the petitioner. Thus, we find no error apparent on the face of the record, to warrant review of the main order.
4. Accordingly, the application stands rejected. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Ankit. Digitally signed by :- ANKIT VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad