APHC010187292024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9647/2024 Between: 1. S.SAFIULLA, S/O.LATE KHASIM SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O.1-1120, INDIRANAGAR, RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, AT CHITTOOR. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMAKUPPAM POLICE STATION, RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. C RAJA REDDY, S/O.JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. 1-776, KOTARUPALEM (REDDY STREET), RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. C SUNANDAMMA, W/O.RAJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. 1-776, KOTARUPALEM (REDDY STREET), RAMAKUPPAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. SREEGALA RATHNAMMA, W/O.JYARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O.BAGAINATHAM, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. NARESH REDDY, S/O.IATE ASHOK REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. 1-776, KOTARUPALEM (REDDY STREET), RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 10. VINATHA, W/O.NARESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. 1-776, KOTARUPALEM (REDDY STREET), RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Authorities in refusing to receive the complaint dated 13-3-2024 made by the Petitioner, and not considering the same and as well as not registering FIR against the Respondents 6 to 10, as arbitrary. illegal, against to principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the Respondent Authorities to register FIR against the Respondents 6 to 10 and proceed with the case, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Authorities in refusing to receive the complaint dated 13-3-2024 made by the Petitioner, and not considering the same and as well as not registering FIR against the Respondents 6 to 10, as arbitrary. illegal, against to principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the Respondent Authorities to register FIR against the Respondents 6 to 10 and proceed with the case, and to pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that respondent No.5 received the complaint of the Petitioner through registered post and during enquiry, it came to light that the entire matter is related to the civil dispute with regard to the subject land and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 9647 of 2024 22.11.2025 Mjl /* Dinesh