Tathireddy Sunandha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/16013/2021 · 2025-10-06
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52526 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52526 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010245212021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16013/2021
Between:
1. TATHIREDDY SUNANDHA, W/O.PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.VIDYA NAGAR, BADVEL TOWN AND MUNICIPALITY, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMRAVATHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BADVEL URBAN POLICE STATION, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR, BADVEL URBAN POLICE STATION, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT. 6. BATHALA RAJASEKHAR, S/O.VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O.BAYANAPALLI MAIN ROAD, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
7.
BATHALA VENKATAMMA, W/O.VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O.BAYANAPALLI MAIN ROAD, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 86 5 in interfering with the matters of civil disputes pertains to the construction of house in Plot No.7 admeasuring Ac.0.03 cents in Survey No.1779/1 of Chennampalli Village Fields, Badvel Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violating Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere in civil dispute pertains to the construction of house in Plot No.7 admeasuring Ac.0.03 cents in Survey No.1779/1 of Chennampalli Village Fields, Badvel Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District, Andhra Pradesh and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 86 5 not to interfere in civil dispute pertains to the construction of house in Plot No.7 admeasuring Ac.0.03 cents in Survey No.1779/1 of Chennampalli Village Fields, Badvel Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District, Andhra Pradesh and not to harass the petitioner in calling to the respondent Police Station, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3 THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16013 of 2021 The Court made the following Order:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“....
to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 86 5 in interfering with the matters of civil disputes pertains to the construction of house in Plot No.7 admeasuring Ac.0.03 cents in Survey No.1779/1 of Chennampalli Village Fields, Badvel Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violating Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere in civil dispute pertains to the construction of house in Plot No.7 admeasuring Ac.0.03 cents in Survey No.1779/1 of Chennampalli Village Fields, Badvel Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District, Andhra Pradesh.”
2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated: 07.10.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16013 of 2021
Date: 07.10.2025 PSA