1 2025:CGHC:275 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1488 of 2024 1. Gram Panchayat, Ameri, (Established Under Relevant Statutory Povision of the C.G. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam 1993), Janpad Panchayat Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, through its Present Sarpanch/Authorized Representative Smt. Fulbai Chouhan, W/o Shri Subas Chouhan, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Ameri Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2. Smt. Fulbai Chouhan, W/o Shri Subas Chouhan, Aged About 49 Years, Present Elected Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat Ameri, R/o Village Ameri Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. Durga Shankar Bhoi, S/o Shri Ram Chandra Bhoi, Aged About 31 Years, Present Secretary Of Gram Panchayat Ameri, R/o Village Ameri Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1. Ku. Niharika Barik Singh, Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Kartikey Goyal, Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. Dharmesh Kumar Sahu, Collector, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4. Smt. Richa Choudhary, The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate. For respondent No.3 : Mr. Arpit Agrawal, counsel appears on advance copy. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 03/01/2025 1. Today, the case is listed for orders on default(s), as pointed out by the Registry. 2 2. Heard. 3. Alleging that the respondents No.1 to 4 have not complied with the orders and directions issued by this Court in WP(C) No.4505/2022 dated 22.08.2024, the petitioners/complainants are before this court in this contempt petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that order under contempt has been complied with and the representation filed by the petitioners has been decided by the respondent authorities. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 on advance copy conceded the submission of learned counsel for petitioner that the order under contempt has been complied with. 6. In view of the fact that respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 22.08.2024 passed in WP(C) No.4505/2022 of this Court and the representation filed by the petitioners has been disposed of, as contended by both the parties, I do not find any reason to proceed further in the matter initiating contempt proceeding against the respondents No.1 to 4. 7. Accordingly, contempt proceeding is dropped. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Date: 2025.01.03 16:56:33 +0530