IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.35237 of 2025 Santosh Kumar Darjee …. Petitioner Mr. T. D.K. Dora, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC Mr. P.K. Tripathy, Advocate for TPWODL CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 19.02.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Learned counsel appearing for TPWODL on instruction contended that since petitioner is facing a Vigilance Proceeding in Sambalpur Vigilance P.S. Case No.9 dated 12.03.2022, the gratuity amount and other retiral benefits of the petitioner has not been released save and except, the provisional pension. 4. It is contended that the aforesaid pendency of the Vigilance Proceeding was not disclosed by the petitioner p. 2 p. 2 in the Writ Petition nor in the representation filed by him under Annexure-4. 5. At this point of time, learned counsel for the petitioner begging apology prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to file it afresh. 6. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev