1 2025:CGHC:8037-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No.81 of 2025 1 - Rajbahadur Mourya, S/o Shri Bholanath Mourya, Aged About 38 Years, Caste Koiri, R/o Village Kumharpara, Sanjay Nagar, Supela Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (Chhattisgarh) Applicant versus 1 - Smt Urmila Bai (Died) Through Legal Heirs - 1.1 - Domar Singh Anand S/o Late Shri Dashrath Lal Anand Aged About 29 Years 1.2 - Mani Ram Anand S/o Late Shri Dashrath Lal Anand Aged About 26 Years 1.3 - Loknath Anand S/o Late Shri Dashrath Lal Anand Aged About 25 Years 1.4 - Charan Das Anand S/o Late Shri Dashrath Lal Anand Aged About 23 Years All R/o Village Gondpendri, Police Station Utai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Deleted (Basanta Bai) As Per R.J. Note Dated 24-04-2017 (Respondent No. 1) 3 - Smt Indu Bai W/o Pairdas Satnami Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Sirri (General Store Of Manoj Bandhe) Police Station Utai, Post Machandur, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Balod (Chhattisgarh) (Respondent No. 2) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh)(Respondent No.4) Digitally signed by RAMAKANT NIRALA 2 Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. C. K. Sahu, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Nand Kumari Kashyap, PL For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Rohan Kumbhare, Advocate on behalf of Mr. T. K. Jha, Advocate Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 14/02/2025 1. The present MCC has been filed by the applicant seeking modification in the order dated 20.11.2024 passed in FA No.192/2017. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in para 12 of the order, Khasra No.214/3 has wrongly been mentioned instead of Khasra No.206/2, therefore, the said part of the order may kindly be modified. 3. On perusal of the order dated 20.11.2024 passed in FA No.192/2017, it appears that in para 12 of the said order, only the issues were mentioned, which were infact framed by the learned Trial Court and no order or decree with regard to Khasra No.214/3 in question has been passed and in the original record itself, Khasra No.214/3 has been mentioned, as such we are not inclined to entertain the present MCC. 4. Accordingly, the MCC is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved 3 in favour of the applicant to approach before the Trial Court or Revenue Court concerned, as the case may be, for redressal of his grievance. Sd/- Sd/- Rajani Dubey Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Judge Judge Nirala