1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1030 of 2025 1 - Rajesh Milan S/o Shri Biharilal Aged About 28 Years Address Village Khairjhiti, Police Station- Bilaigarh, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Police (Home) Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director General Of Police Department Of Home Affairs, Police Head Quarter Chhattisgarh, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, (C.G.) 3 - The Inspector General Of Police Raipur Range, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Balodabazar, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 13/10/2025 1. Vide order dated 20.8.2025 passed in WPS No. 3729/2023, this Court has held as under:- “1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for fol reliefs- "10.1 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records relating to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to revoke the suspension order dated 16.02.2022. whereby the petitioner was put under suspension from 28.09.2021 by the respondent no.2 in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief which Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 3 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.” 2. The petitioner has filed an application for modification of the order while seeking prayer to this effect that instead of dismissing the petition having become infructous, it may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file duly constituted writ petition, for adjudication on merits, in the interest of justice. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, it seems that the petitioner has prayed for revocation of suspension order dated 16.2.2022 whereby the petitioner was put under suspension from 28.9.2021 by respondent No. 2 in the interest of justice. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the prayer made by the petitioner, it is being dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition in case cause of action arises and there would be any exigency to file any petition. 5. Accordingly, MCC is allowed and the order is modify to the above extent. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat