Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52494 (KAR)

SRI PAVANKUMAR S/O KESHAVRAO MURALKAR v. SMT JAYASHREE W/O KESHAVRAO MURALKAR

RPFC/100080/2025 · 2025-08-04

G Basavaraja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9719 RPFC No. 100080 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100080 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI PAVANKUMAR S/O. KESHAVRAO MURALKAR AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. LECTURER, R/O. SRI MANIK PRABHU UNITED UNDER-GRADUATE COLLEGE, MANIK NAGAR, TQ. HUMANABAD, DIST. BIDAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VYAS DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. JAYASHREE W/O. KESHAVRAO MURALKAR AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. GARAG, TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD. [[ 2. SHRI. KESHAVRAO S/O. GOVINDRAO MURALKAR AGE. 70 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. GARAG, TQ.DIST. DHARWAD …RESPONDENTS THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS, ALLOW THIS REVISION PETITION, SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.04.2025 PASSED IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS 293/2024 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, DHARWAD, AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT AND PROPER IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.08.06 11:05:45 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9719 RPFC No. 100080 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA) Learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the Petition. The same reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioner most respectfully submits as follows: The petitioner has preferred the instant petition challenging the order dated 05.04.2025 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dharwad. That as the petitioner has challenged an interlocutory order, with petition would be maintainable. The petitioner has inadvertently preferred present RPFC. The petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file writ petition. Hence this memo.” 2. Memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file writ petition as sought for, if it is permissible under law. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE Lnn/CT-CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 1