APHC010495642023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25615 OF 2023 Between: 1. DODDAGALLA JYOTHI, W/o (late) Babu, Aged about 45 years, Occ. housewife, R/o. Allagadda Bus Stand Backside, Pragna College Road, Yesunadhapuram, Allagadda Town, Nandyala District, Erstwhile Kurnool District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Nandyala District, Nandyala, Erstwhile Kurnool District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda Sub Division, Allagadda, Nandyala District, Erstwhile Kurnool District. 4. The Station House Officer, Allagadda Town Police Station, Allagadda, Nandyala District, Erstwhile Kurnool District. 5. Singam Bhagya Lakshmi, W/o Venkateswara Reddy, R/o. House No.7-3-4, Thommandru street, Allagadda town, Nandyala District, Erstwhile Kurnool District. 6. Singam Venkateswara Reddy, S/o not known to the petitioner, R/o. House No.7-3-4, Thommandru street, Allagadda town, Nandyala District, Erstwhile Kurnool District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent for not respond on the petitioner's representation, dated 28-08-2023 and also not take any action on the 5th and 6th respondents based on the petitioner's representation is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of the principal of natural justice and violative of the Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent, as to direct the 4th respondent for conducting enquiry on the petitioner's representation, dated 28-08-2023 and to register appropriate case against the 5th and 6th respondents, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the 2nd respondent forthwith to conduct enquiry on the petitioner's representation, dated 28-08-2023, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMESH N Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25615 OF 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent for not respond on the petitioner's representation, dated 28-08-2023 and also not take any action on the 5th and 6th respondents based on the petitioner's representation is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of the principal of natural justice and violative of the Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent, as to direct the 4th respondent for conducting enquiry on the petitioner's representation, dated 28-08-2023 and to register appropriate case against the 5th and 6th respondents, and pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions, would submit that since the subject matter in the present petition is civil in nature, the respondent police have not registered the crime against the unofficial respondents on the complaint dated 28.08.202 made by the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no Order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22-11-2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25615 of 2023 Dated.22-11-2025 KKV 66 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.25615 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 22.11.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV