APHC010477552024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24534/2024 Between: 1. YEDULA GOPALA KRISHNAIAH, S/O RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, CULTIVATION, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O TELLAPURI VILLAGE, GOSPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOMEDEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYALA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANDYALA POLICE STATION, NANDYALA DISTRICT. 4. KATAMREDDY THULASI REDDY, S/O SUBBA REDDY, R/O TELLAPURI VILLAGE, GOSPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of Respondent no.3 in the interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the landed property of an extent of Ac.l.85cts in S.No.305 pyki with present S.No.305/1, 305/3, 305/4 and Ac.0-25cts in S.No.326 pyki of Tellapuri Village, presently Gospadu Mandal, Nandyala District (previously Kurnool District) at the instance of Respondent no.4 who highhandedly damaged the crop in the said land and that the inaction on the part of Respondent nos.2 and 3 in initiating action against Respondent no.4 despite the Complaint / Report dt.21-10- 2024 given and sent through RPAD, and despite the fact of pendency of S.A.No.1081 of 2002 before this Hon ble Court between the Petitioner and Respondent no.4 is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, and in violation of the fundamental rights of the Petitioner guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution India, by consequently directing Respondent no.2 to initiate strict action against Respondent no.4 upon the Complaint / Report dt.21-10-2024 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to Direct the Respondent nos.2 and 3 to take action upon the Complaint / Report dt.21-10-2024 given by the Petitioner to take action against Respondent No.4, pending disposal of Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24534/2024 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of Respondent no.3 in the interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the landed property of an extent of Ac.l.85cts in S.No.305 pyki with present S.No.305/1, 305/3, 305/4 and Ac.0-25cts in S.No.326 pyki of Tellapuri Village, presently Gospadu Mandal, Nandyala District (previously Kurnool District) at the instance of Respondent no.4 who highhandedly damaged the crop in the said land and that the inaction on the part of Respondent nos.2 and 3 in initiating action against Respondent no.4 despite the Complaint / Report dt.21-10- 2024 given and sent through RPAD, and despite the fact of pendency of S.A.No.1081 of 2002 before this Hon ble Court between the Petitioner cind Respondent no.4 is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, and in violation of the fundamental rights of the Petitioner guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution India, by consequently directing Respondent no.2 to initiate strict action against Respondent no.4 upon the Complaint / Report dt.21-10-2024 and pass such…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri P.AjayBabu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.12.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 73 WRIT PETITION NO: 24534/2024 Dated.20.12.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 24534/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 20.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV