PRAKASH NARAYAN SHRIVAS v. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED
WPS/2071/2021 · 2025-09-17
Shri Sachin Singh Rajput
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52470 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52470 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:48176
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2071 of 2021 1 - Prakash Narayan Shrivas S/o Late Shri Kunj Ram Shrivas Aged About 62 Years R/o Gevra Basti Kusmunda, Tahsil Kusmunda, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited A Miniratna Company Subsidiary Of Coal India Limited, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Secl Bhawan, Seepat Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - General Manager South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Kusmunda Area, Kusmunda, Tahsil Kusmunda, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - General Manager (P And A) South Eastern Coalfields Limited Head Quarter, Secl, Bhawan, Seepat Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate. (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sachin Singh Rajput)
Order on Board 18/09/2025
1. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :-
2 1) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the arrears of amount of the petitioner in compliance of the award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Jabalpur in Case No.
CGIT/LC/R/125/2012 on 20/03/2020. 2) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid
facts and circumstances of the case. 3) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant cost of the petition.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that an award has been passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur in Case No. CGIT/LC/R/125/2012 in favour of the petitioner, but the same has not been complied with by the Respondents – SECL, therefore, instant writ petition has been filed seeking relief, as stated above.
3. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/SECL would submit that the respondents - SECL has filed Writ Petition (L) No. 43 /2021, challenging the aforesaid award and this Court was pleased to grant interim relief in favour of the respondents in that writ petition.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. Since WPL No. 43 of 2021 filed the respondents -SECL has been dismissed by this Court, therefore, this petition stands disposed of directing the respondents - SECL to comply with the award passed by the CGIT in its letter & spirit in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observations & directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput)
Judge Ami
AMITA DUBEY Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2025.09.29 13:50:51 +0530