APHC010496102024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25536/2024 Between: 1. DASARI AMMANNI, W/O RAMU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO 308, B-BLOCK, SRI KOVIND APARTMENT, KABALA CENTRE, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. DASARI RAMU, . S/O ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO 308, B-BLOCK, SRI KOVIND APARTMENT, KABALA CENTRE, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. DASARI MANOZ, S/O RAMU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO 308, B-BLOCK, SRI KOVIND APARTMENT, KABALA CENTRE, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAWABPETA POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAWABPETA POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. VELURU VENKATA RATHNAM, S/O NARASAIAH @ NARASIMHAM, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/O 28/4/99, MYPADU ROAD, KISHAN NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. VELUM MADHUSUDHANA RAO, S/O VELUM VENAKATA RATHNAM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/O 28/4/99, MYPADU ROAD, KISHAN NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. VELURU HARI BABU, , S/O VELURU VENAKATA RATHNAM, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O 28-5-235, VENUGOPAL NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners and frequently summoning the petitioners to the police station otherwise than due process of law as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners life and liberty by summoning to police station without following due process of law.” 2. Sri Siva Prasad Reddy Venati, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Police are calling the Petitioners to the Police Station without following due process of law. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by Respondent No.5 through PGRS, the Petitioners were called to the Police Station for enquiry, however, no crime has been registered against the Petitioners. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to summon the Petitioners to the Police Station, without there being any case registered against them. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25536 of 2024 Dt.20.12.2025 Dinesh