Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5246 (RAJ)

MANISH SONI S/O SHRI SHIV KUMAR SONI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1468/2025 · 2025-06-05

Mukesh Rajpurohit V J

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22920] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1468/2025 Manish Soni S/o Shri Shiv Kumar Soni, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Shiv Bhawan, Chandpole, Jodhpur, At Present Residing At Plot No. 80 G 2, Mahadev Nagar, Jagatpura, Police Station Ramnagariya, Jaipur (East), Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Jaipur ) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V. R. Bajwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sneh Deep Khayaliya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAG Mr. Anuj Sharma, Mr. Raghav Pandey for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Order 05/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.71/2024 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420, 409, 379, 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2025 and conclusion of the trial will take considerable time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State as well as counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:22920] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1468/2025] 4. Upon query made by this Court from counsel appearing on behalf of complainant with regard to order passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 26.03.2025 about some sensitive information of the complainant's company, learned counsel for the complainant submits that he has made requisite information to the Investigating Officer. 5. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the present case, and perused the record as also arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties, since petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2025 and charge-sheet has already been filed for offence under Sections 420, 408 of IPC and conclusion of trial will take time, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Manish Soni S/o Shri Shiv Kumar Soni is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J TN/9