SHOKINDRA v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS AND 8 OTHERS
A227/8149/2018 · 2025-05-11
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52455 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52455 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:76721
Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8149 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shokindra Respondent :- Additional District And Sessions And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nipun Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Jagdish Prasad Mishra,Rakesh Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Sri Abhijit Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Nipun Singh, counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous. In view of the statement so made by counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 12.5.2025 Kushal Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad