IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 8970 OF 2015 > I I ■o X: 1 -s.- Between: Village, Samalkot, East Satv^Rud^i o'! '*? Partner Edala Veera Venkata oatya Rudra Murthy Chowdary. S/o.late Suryanarayana, Aged 36 years ...Petitioner AND 1. The Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Rep by its Chairman & Managing Director, Visakhapatnam (AP) ^ 2. Divisional Engineer (Operations), The Eastern Power Company of A.P. Ltd., Kakinaga, East Godavari District (AP) |higineer (Operations, The Eastern Power [^stribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Samalkot, East Godavari District Distribution ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus to declare the i Proceedings may impugned issued by : : the Lr.No.ADE/SLO/dkt/D.No.364/2015 dated 3rd respondent in 17-03-2015 served on the petitioner on 19-03-2015 and,: subsequent disconnection connection vide H.T.SC.No.HT RJY 1131 for of service nonpayment of C.C. Charges Unduru Village as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also contrary to the provisions of the General Terms and Conditions of supply and also Electricity Act, 2003 and for a outstanding atainst M/s. Vinayaka Mini Modern Rice Mill, with S.C.No.619/654 Cat.lll A consequential direction, direct the respondents to restore the power supply vide H.T.Sc.No.HT RJY 1131 Rural, East Godavari District, in the interest of justice I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015fWPMP. NQ: 11810 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court pleased to direct the respondents to restore the petitioner vide H.T.SC.No. HT RJY 1131, Unduru Village, Samalkot Godavari District, pursuant to the impugned notice dated 17-03-2015, which was served on the petitioner on 19-03-2015, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition petitioners Unduru Village, Samalkot may be s power supply Rural, East I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWVMP. NO: 1356 OF 2015) Between: i'l; K.y. Raghu, S/o. Late N. Sai Baba, aged about 41 years Occ As«;i«5tant A P^Sd^ ^Perations,j^|^iEastern Power Distribution A.P. Ltd., Samalkot, East Godavari District (AP) Company of ...Petitioner/Respondent No.3 ' AND 1. M/s^di Vinayaka Raw &'Boiied Rice Mill, Undur Village Samalkot East Godavari District, Represented by its Managing Partner Edala Agl?36®yea1-s Chowdary. S/o.llte Suryanarayank ...Petitioner Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd Reo bv its Chairman & Managing Director; Visakhapatnam (AP) ’ ^ 3. Divisional Engineer (Operltipns), The Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Kakinaga, 4st Godavari DistricUAP) ...Respondents No.2, 3 praying that in the circumstances petition, the High Court may be Petition under Section 151 CPc stated in the affidavit filed i ' m '' pleased to vacate the interim orders WPMP.No.11810 of 2015 in W.P.No.8970 of 2015 granted on 01-04-2015 in Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: SRI V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following; Order APHC010073102015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY JHE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 8970/2015 / Between: M/s. Siddi Vinayaka Raw A Boiled Rice Mill AND The Eastern Power Distribution Company Of A P Ltd and ...RESPONDENT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 ...PETITIONER 1.P RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VV SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Impugning the proceedings issued by respondent No.3 vide Lr.No.ADE/SLO/dkt/D.No.364/2015. dated 17.03.2015, the above writ petition is filed. On 01.04.2015, an interim order was granted to restore the power supply to the petitioner’s rice mill. 2. Page 2 of 3 I. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Given the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VENU GOPAL RAO assistant registrar SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, / 1. One CC to SRI P RAJ KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies gsg HIGH COURT DATED; 01/05/2025 \ ORDER WP.No.8970 of 2015 5^ Surcosrl"'’ "‘^ucTuous