1 2025:CGHC:50562 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5313 of 2025 1 - Neha Verma W/o Bharat Verma Aged About 25 Years R/o House No 30, Ward No 16, Manjhala Gothiya Para, Sukhatal, P.O- Sarangpurkhurd, Kawardha District- Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 3 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Kabirdham District Kabirdham (C.G.) 4 - Ashok Verma Posted As Secretary, Gram Panchayat Sukhatal, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Prateek Singh Thakur, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. A.G. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 10.10.2025 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Hon'ble Court to the Respondent authorities to consider upon the complaints of the petitioner which pending since long with the respondent authorities, therefore he prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P/4) dated 20.08.2025. Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.10.10 16:13:36 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending complaint, he is having no objection to the limited prayer and pending complaint dated 20.08.2025 will be considered in accordance with law. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the respondents No. 2 & 3 to consider/decide the representation of the petitioner dated 20.08.2025 in accordance with law/rules/regulations as expeditiously as possible after giving opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti