Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52448 (AP)

KOTAPATI NARASIMHA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/27725/2025 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010534832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27725/2025 Between: 1. KOTAPATI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. KOTAPATI CHINAMALA KONDARAYUDU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.76-8/1-3/A, TELEPHONE COLONY, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI (V), THULLUR (M), GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE S H O 1TOWN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLUTLA SAI AVINASH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in refusing to non-issuance the mandatory notice U/s 157(2) of BNSS for acquainting the reasons for non- investigation of my Complaint Dt 07.09.2025, as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of powers, envisage and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to consider and conduct investigation of my complaint Dt 07.09.2025, for pursuing alternative remedy before the Jurisdictional Magistrate 2 vide Private Complaint and to grant such other reliefsin my favor, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition” 2. Heard Sri P.Sai Avinash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that based on complaint given by the petitioner, police have registered a crime. 4. Recording the said submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27725 of 2025 Dt.14.10.2025 Asr