APHC010628682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12140 of 2025 Between: 1. TALLURI ANASUYA RANI, W/O. V.KIRAN KUMAR, AGE ABOUT 55 YEARS D/O. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, OCC GOVT, EMPLOYEE, CB2, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. TALLURI MADAVARAO., S/O. VENKATA SUBBARAO, AGE ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O. VEMAVARAM VILLAGE, KOUTHAVARAM POST, GUNDLAVALLRU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. TALLURI VENKATA SUBBA RAO,, S/O. LATE. MADHAVA RAO. AGE ABOUT 75 YEARS. R/O. VEMAVARAM VILLAGE, KOUTHAVARAM POST, GUNDLAVALLRU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. N. UMA MAHESWARI,, W/O. M.CHAKRAPANI OCC AO, LIE OFFICE, AGE ABOUT 52 YEARS NUZIVEEDU BRANCH, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. V.V.K.SURESH,, S/O.NOT KNOWN OCC GOVT., EMPLOYEE, AGE ABOUT 60 YEARS 0/O.LIC OF INDIA, 4TH LANE, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR. 6. I. VENKATA RAO,, S/O.NOT KNOWN OCC CASHIER, AGE ABOUT 50YEARS. O/O. LIE OF INDIA, CAREER AGENTS BRANCH GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH SHO, PS ARUNDALPET, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, AMARAVATHI. 2. VEERNAPU KIRAN KUMAR, S/O LATE DAVID PAUL AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE. RIO DOOR NO. 4-15-41 POSTAL COLONY GUNTUR TOWN PRESENTLY RESIDING AT DOOR NO 4-16-56/2, 6TH LANE BHARATHPET, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. JILLEPALLI SUHAS KIRAN 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 6, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.232 of 2025 of Arundalpet Police Station, Guntur District registered for the offences under Sections 351(2) read with 3(5) BNS, 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the SCs and the STs (PoA) Act. 2. I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are filed by Respondent No.2 seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise between him and the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 6. 3. Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 6 and Respondent No.2 appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. 4. Both parties would submit that they came to an amicable settlement for withdrawal of the case in Crime No.232 of 2025 of Arundalpet Police Station, Guntur District pending between them. Respondent No.2 submits that, he is not interested to prosecute the matter and that they compromised the matter and hence, the case may be closed. Respondent No. 2 has stated that, being a government 3 employee, he has rejected to accept compensation after the registration of this crime. 5. Considering the submissions, in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another1, since there is an amicable settlement between them, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the case against the Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 6 in Crime No.232 of 2025 of Arundalpet Police Station, Guntur District, is hereby quashed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Asr 1 2012(10)SCC 303 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No. 12140 of 2025 Dt.22.11.2025 Asr