APHC010467372017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 974/2017 Between: 1. K GOWRAMMA, W/O.K.NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT :54 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.20/336-I, AMBARI STREET, OLD TOWN, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ANOTHER, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI LAKSHMI CHENNA KESAVA SWAMY TEMPLE, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersaggrieved by the Decree and Order dt. 07.02.2017 passed in OA.No. 976 of 2010 (Old No. 60 / 2007) on the file of A.P. Endowments Tribunal at Pedakakani. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CMAMP 1624 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the decree and Order dt.07.02.2017 passed in OA No.976 of 2010 (Old No.60/2007) on the file of AP Endowments Tribunal, at Pedakakani. IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CMAMP 1625 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 116 days in filing the above CMA. IA NO: 3 OF 2017(CMAMP 1626 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the decree and Order dt.07.02.2017 passed in OA No.976 of 2010 (Old No.60/2007) during the pendency of the appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. S D GOWD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. A SREEKANTH REDDY(SC FOR ENDOW RS) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO:974 OF 2017 ORDER: The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed aggrieved by the decree and order dated 07.02.2017 passed in O.A.No.976 of 2010 on the file of A.P. Endowments Tribunal at Pedakakani. 2. No representation on behalf of the appellant(s). 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the docket order that on 05.11.2024, this Court was informed that learned counsel for the appellant is no more. Therefore, this Court ordered notice to the appellant through Registry. But the appellant refused to receive the notice, which amounts to deemed service of notice. Having received the notice, the appellant neither made any alternative arrangement nor prosecuted the matter in person. Hence, this Court posted the matter to 07.11.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. This shows that appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 07.11.2025 BSP 195 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO:974 of 2017 07.11.2025 BSP