APHC010501762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26339 OF 2025 Between: 1. TALARI SUBRAMANYAM, AS S/o KrishnaiahRamakrishnaiah Aged about 62years, R/o Palamangalam North, Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department. Sec Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist. 2. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati. 3. 3. The Station House Officer, Narayanavanam Police Station, Narayanavanam,Tirupati Dist 4. AqaramPrabhakar Reddy, S/o Ramalinga Reddy, Aged about 65years. R/ Palamangalam North, Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. 5 5. KuppaSwamy Reddy, S/o Perra Reddy, Aged about SOyears, R/o PalamangalamNorth,Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. 6. 6. Sai Ravi Kumar, /o C. Subramanyam, Aged Major, village Sarpanch, R/ Palamangalam North, Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. 7. AgaramNagaraju, S/o KuppuSwamy Reddy, Aged Major, R/o Palamangalam North, Narayanavanam Mandal. Tirupati Dist. 8. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 26339 OF 2025 1. TALARI SUBRAMANYAM, AS S/o KrishnaiahRamakrishnaiah Aged about 62years, R/o Palamangalam North, Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department. Sec Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist. 2. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati. 3. 3. The Station House Officer, Narayanavanam Police Station, Narayanavanam,Tirupati Dist 4. AqaramPrabhakar Reddy, S/o Ramalinga Reddy, Aged about 65years. R/ Palamangalam North, Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. 5 5. KuppaSwamy Reddy, S/o Perra Reddy, Aged about SOyears, R/o PalamangalamNorth,Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. 6. 6. Sai Ravi Kumar, /o C. Subramanyam, Aged Major, village Sarpanch, R/ Palamangalam North, Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. 7. AgaramNagaraju, S/o KuppuSwamy Reddy, Aged Major, R/o Palamangalam North, Narayanavanam Mandal. Tirupati Dist. 8. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. TALARI SUBRAMANYAM, AS S/o KrishnaiahRamakrishnaiah Aged about 62years, R/o Palamangalam North, Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. ...Petitioner 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department. Secretariat 3. The Station House Officer, Narayanavanam Police Station, 4. AqaramPrabhakar Reddy, S/o Ramalinga Reddy, Aged about 65years. R/o 5. KuppaSwamy Reddy, S/o Perra Reddy, Aged about SOyears, R/o 6. Sai Ravi Kumar, /o C. Subramanyam, Aged Major, village Sarpanch, R/o 7. AgaramNagaraju, S/o KuppuSwamy Reddy, Aged Major, R/o 8. Agaram Prakash, S/o Ramachandra Reddy, Aged Major, T3.Jtijorth,Narayanavanam Mandal, Tirupati Dist. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ of mandamus declaring the .action of the respondents 2 and ,3 in not taking any action on the plaints of the petitioner dated.19.07.2025 and 21.07.2025 against the . respondents 4 to 8 and providingthe protection to the life of the petitioner is arbitrary, illegal, improper, incorrect and violative of the Article 21 of the Constitution Of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to take action on the complaints of the petitioner dated.19.07.2025 and 21.07.2025 against the respondents 4 to 8 and provide the protection to the life of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as.thisHonble Court may deem fit and proper. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to take action on the complaints of the petitioner dated.19.07.2025 and 21.07.2025 against the respondents 4 to 8 and provide protection to the life of the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other ordpr or orders as this Flon’ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: V V N NARASIMHAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26339 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue writ of mandamus declaring the .action of the respondents 2 and ,3 in not taking any action on the plaints of the petitioner dated.19.07.2025 and 21.07.2025 against the . respondents 4 to 8 and providingthe protection to the life of the petitioner is arbitrary, illegal, improper, incorrect and violative of the Article 21 of the Constitution Of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to take action on the complaints of the petitioner dated.19.07.2025 and 21.07.2025 against the respondents 4 to 8 and provide the protection to the life of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as.thisHonble Court may deem fit and proper.....…” 2. Heard Sri VVN Narasimha, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given a representation to the police seeking protection for his life and property, as he was granted a decree of permanent injunction in O.S.No.246 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur, which was decreed in his favour. Against the said decree, the unofficial respondents preferred A.S.No.9 of 2013, which was dismissed, and thereafter filed S.A.No.522 of 2016, which was also dismissed. Despite the dismissal of the said appeals, the unofficial respondents are threatening the petitioner and attempting to dispossess him from the property, compelling him to approach the police seeking protection for his life and property. Even thereafter, unofficial respondents are threatened the petitioner to dispossess from the property that is why they have submitted a representation to the police to give protection to safe their life and property. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that a crime in Cr.No.83 of 2025 dated 24.09.2025 for the offences under Sections 329(3), 351(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS on the file of Narayanavanam Police Station, Tirupathi has been registered against the unofficial respondents and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter. 5. Recording the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.09.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 644 W.P.No.26339 of 2025 Dated: 25.09.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.26339 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 1 25.09.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV