- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13467 CP No. 100154 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CIVIL PETITION NO. 100154 OF 2025 BETWEEN: PRASHANTI W/O.. MADHUKAR SHETTY AGE. 38 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD, R/O. GANESH NAGAR, SIRSI, PIN-581401, U.K. DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAY MALALI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ARUNACHAL P. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: MADHUKAR RAGHAV SHETTY AGE. 46 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O. FLAT NO.101, VIENA HEIGHTS, HATHIL, 1ST CROSS, NEAR AIR INDIA OFFICE, MANGALURU-575003. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. J.S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS CIVIL PETITION FILED U/SEC.24 OF CPC, PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER DIRECTING FOR TRANSFER OF MC NO.221/2025 FROM PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE MANGALORE, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT TO SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT SIRSI OF UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT IN ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.09.26 14:38:09 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13467 CP No. 100154 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent are present. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has filed a memo, in which it is stated as under: “In view of the fact that the petitioner filing a matrimonial case No.10/2025. The respondent is intending to withdraw the M.C.No.221/2025 filed by him before the Principal Family Judge, Mangalore, and intend to avoid the parallel legal proceedings. As such this civil petition would not service for consideration. Hence this memo.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the said memo. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for both parties, the petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE AC Ct-cmu/LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 37