APHC010017722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 99/2025 Between: 1. SRI LAKSHMI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, M.RAMA DEVI, W/O M. MURALI KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 6-374/6, OPP MUNICIPAL OFFICER, FIRE STATION ROAD, CHILAKALURIPETA, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522 238 2. RAMESH KUMAR SUMAN, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522 238 3. ALIM BASHA, THE COMMISSIONER THE MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MANGALAGIRI, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. NAGAMALLESWARA RAO, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER (FAC) MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MANGALAGIRI, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under the provisions of contempt of courts Act for willfully disobeying the orders of this Hon’ble Court passed in W.P No. 10128 OF 2024dated 07.05.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMINENI SUDHEER Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 07.05.2024 passed in W.P.No.10128 of 2024. 2. On 16.10.2025, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with. To the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to get instructions. 3. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. 4. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents, the Contempt Case is closed. However, if the petitioner feel that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25th November, 2025 RKS