APHC010539152024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28050/2024 Between: 1. JAMPANI SRILATHA, C/O. RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, RESIDNET OF H.NO.2-43/3, MAIN ROAD, VYKUNTAPURAM VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. BHAVANA VENKATARAO, , S/O. VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. RESIDENT OF H.NO.2-43/3, VYKUNTAPURAM VILLAGE, AMARAVATI MANDAL, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. BHAVNA SRINIVAS,, S/O. VENKATARAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. RESIDENT OF H.NO.2-43/3, VYKUNTAPURAM VILLAGE, AMARAVATI MANDAL, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY/, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, THULLUR SUB-DIVISION, THULLUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THULLUR POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. YALAMANCHILI VENKATA SIVA SATYANARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. RESIDENT OF H.NO.8-49/3, NEARTDP OFFICE, THULLUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. SHAIK GALI SHAHID BABU, S/O. LATE SHAIK JOHNY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDENT OF H.NO. 7-53/1, THULLUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. PUVVADA HARISH, S/O. VIJAYA BHASKARA RAO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDENT OF H.NO.4-15, THULLUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. PATAN JOHNY BEGUM, , W/O. PATAN CHINNAVALI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. RESIDENT OF H.NO.7-39, GUNDLAPALLI VILLAGE, NEKARIKALLU MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of 3rd and 4thRespondent herein at the behest of the Respondents 5 to 8 in interfering with the civil dispute/issue between the Petitioner and the Respondent 5 to 8 herein as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the 3rd and 4thRespondent herein not interfering with the civil issues between the Petitioners and the Respondents 5 to 8 herein in so far as the property measuring an extent of Ac.2.65 cents in Sy.No.150/2 situated in Vykuntapuram Village, Amaravati Mandal, Palnadu District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3RD and 4TH Respondent herein not interfering with the civil dispute/issue between the Petitioners and the Respondents 5 to 8 herein pertaining to property measuring an extent of Ac.2.65 cents in Sy.No.150/2 situated in Vykuntapuram Village, Amaravati Mandal, Palnadu District, Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SAMBANGI MALLIKHARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28050 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of 3rd and 4thRespondent herein at the behest of the Respondents 5 to 8 in interfering with the civil dispute/issue between the Petitioner and the Respondent 5 to 8 herein as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the 3rd and 4thRespondent herein not interfering with the civil issues between the Petitioners and the Respondents 5 to 8 herein in so far as the property measuring an extent of Ac.2.65 cents in Sy.No.150/2 situated in Vykuntapuram Village, Amaravati Mandal, Palnadu District, and pass.…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that based on the complaint made by respondent No.7, a case in Cr.No.256 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 137(2), 115(2), 119(1), 351(2) r/w 3(5) BNS. He would further submit that police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents, except under due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28050 of 2024 Dated.30.12.2025 TVN 293