Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5242 (KAR)

SRI. SHIVAPRASAD K S/O CHANNABASAVANAGOIUDA v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/102855/2024 · 2025-02-12

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2853 WP No. 102855 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102855 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. SHIVAPRASAD K. S/O. CHANNABASAVANAGOIUDA, AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. GUEST LECTURER, R/O: T.S.H.M.S FIRST GRADE COLLEGE, SHIRAGUPPA, DIST: BELLARY- 583121. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. N. MULIMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU -560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION UNNATHA SHIKSHANA SOUDHA, SESHADRI ROAD, BENGALURUR -560001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, T.S.H.M.S FIRST GRADE COLLEGE, SHIRAGUPPA, DIST: BELLARY- 583121. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GANGADHAR J.M., AAG ALONG WITH SMT. KIRTHILATA R. PATIL, HCGP) VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.18 11:21:53 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2853 WP No. 102855 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR IN NATURE OF ANY OTHER WRIT DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY PETITIONER TO DISTRIBUTE THE WORKLOAD IN THE RESPONDENT COLLEGE 3 TILL END OF THIS ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-24. VIDE ANNEXURE-D DATED 06/05/2024 PASS SUCH ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AS IN DUTY BOUND THE PETITIONER SHALL EVER PRAY AN ACT OF KINDNESS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petition has rendered infructuous by efflux of time. In the light of the submission so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition stands disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP / CT: ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1