Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52415 (AP)

KADAPALAYAGARI YERIKALA REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/26583/2025 · 2025-10-13

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010515252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.26583 of 2025 Between: 1. KADAPALAYAGARI YERIKALA REDDY, S/O. LATE K. GANGIREDDY, AGE 57 YEARS, OCC DRIVER, CULTIVATION AND BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO. 1/185, THIPPAYAPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, PULLAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT, OF REVENUE STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDING VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUBREGISTRAR, SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE, RAJAMPET, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 3. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, THIPPAYAPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, PULLAMPETMANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, 4. KADAPALAYAGARI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O. LATE K. GANGIREDDY, AGE 66 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. DOOR NO. 1/111, THIPPAYAPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, PULLAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, 5. KADAPALAYAGARI SUBRAMANYAM REDDY, S/O. K. NARAYANA REDDY, AGE 39 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. DOOR NO. 1/111, THIPPAYAPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, PULLAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate 2 writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in proceeding to register any document pertaining to the property bearing Door No. 1/185, Survey No. 340/2 an extent of 2.500 cents, Thippayapalli Village, Pullampet Mandal, Annamayya District, without considering the objections of the Petitioner and despite the pendency of O.S. No.83 of 2025, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent not to register any document in respect of the said property, if presented by or in favour of Respondents No. 4 and 5 or any one claiming through them, pending disposal of O.S. No 83 of 2025 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nandalur, and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to issue the current House Tax receipts for the subject property in the name of the Petitioner, in accordance with law. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBYAGARI SAIPRATAP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition renders infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication and he also endorsed the same on the bundle. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 14.10.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.26583 of 2025 Date: 14.10.2025 siva