Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52410 (CHH)

RAMKUMAR KHUNTE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/11719/2025 · 2025-10-07

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:50115 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11719 of 2025 1 - Ramkumar Khunte S/o Fulsai Khunte Aged About 49 Years Presently Posted As Teacher (L.B.) Govt. Middle School, Bhainapara, Block- Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan Post Office Mantralaya, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Divisional Joint Director School Education Division, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Amit Kumar Pandey Working As Teacher (L.B.) Government Middle School, Bhainapara, Block Kharsia District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Adity Sharma, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 08 /10/2025 SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY 2 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for records of the case from the respondents. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned transfer order dated 03/06/2025 (Annexure P/1) passed by Respondent No. 4. 10.3 Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon’ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.” 2. This petition is filed challenging the posting of the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 03.06.2025 (Annexure P/1) under the rationalization scheme/policy. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State submits that vide order dated 07.10.2025, the order of the posting of petitioner dated 03.06.2025 (Annexure P/1) has been recalled/canceled and therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In support of his contention, he produced copy of the order passed by the District Education Officer, Raigarh dated 07.10.2025 for perusal of this Court. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the Respondent/State, this writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey