Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52409 (AP)

All India OBC Railway Employees' Association, v. Union of India

WP/6001/2016 · 2025-10-12

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010262352016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6001/2016 Between: 1. ALL INDIA OBC RAILWAY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION,, REGD. NO.21974/52, EAST COAST RAILWAY (ZONAL), BHUBANESWAR, REPRESENTED BY GENERAL SECRETARY M. SATYANARAYAN, S/O. LATE M. SIMHADRI, WORKING AS JUNIOR ENGINEER / P. WAY SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER. WALTAIR, EAST COAST DRM COMPLEX, V ISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED THROUGH MINISTRY OF RAILWAY. RAILWAY BOARD, RAIL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 2. THE CHAIRMAN RAILWAY BOARD, RAIL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 3. CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER, RAIL SADAN. CHANDRASEKHAR POOR. BHUBANESWAR. 4. DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL OFFLIEER, EAST COAST RAILWAY, - DRM OFFICE, DONDAPARTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Art. 226 of Constitution of India, declaring the action of the 2nd to 4th respondents by issuing impugned proceedings and cancelling the office bearers and consequently dropping the facilities and 2 JS,J W.P.No.6001/2016 seizing the office not even communicating to the impugned proceedings vide No. WPU/28/AIOBCREA/CEC/20 1 6, dt.12.02.2016 of 2nd to 4111 respondents their without jurisdiction is as illegal, improper and arbitrary consequently by setting aside the impugned proceedings and declared the petitioners association shall continue their activities till expiry of the tenure i.e., 04.06.2017 and to pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP 2660 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim orders in WPMP.No. 7619 of 2016 in WP.No. 6001 of 2016 dated 3.3.2016. IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 7619 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased by suspending the impugned proceedings vide No.W1311/28/AIOBCREA/CEC/2016. dt.12.02.2016, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. IA NO: 3 OF 2016(WPMP 7620 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directing the respbridents,bY o.handingo over the office premises and permitting to our association to conduct day to day activities and continue to provide facilities to office bearers i.e., passes and CUG phone connections and to pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the interest ofjustice IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 28382 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioners/ Proposed respondents No. 5& 6 as respondents in WP.No.6001/2016 in WPMP.NO. in the interest of Justice IA NO: 8 OF 2016(WPMP 33536 OF 2016 3 JS,J W.P.No.6001/2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 9 OF 2016(WPMP 119981 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 37924 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of the above Writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A PADMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) 2. P BHASKAR 4 JS,J W.P.No.6001/2016 The Court made the following ORDER: Smt. Akella Padma, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 13.10.2025 SCH 5 JS,J W.P.No.6001/2016 102 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6001/2016 Date: 13.10.2025 SCH