1 2025:CGHC:49402 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5142 of 2025 1 - M/s Shashi Distilleries Private Limited (A Private Limited Company Registered Under The Relevant Provisions Of Companies Act), Registered Office - 501/a/4, 9th Mile Stone, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore - 560 076 Through Its Authorized Representative - Sujeet Kumar Shukla, S/o Rambali Shukla, Aged Around 40 Years, R/o Surya Vihar, Najagarh, South Delhi, Delhi - 110043 2 - Sujeet Kumar Shukla S/o Rambali Shukla Aged About 40 Years R/o Plot No. 116, Kh. No. 747, F/f, Left Side Surya Vihar, Near Bhararth Gas, Najafgarh, South West Delhi, Delhi - 110043. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Excise, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) 2 -The Collector Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - The Joint/additional Collector Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Superintendent Of Police Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Assistant Excise Commissioner Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Station House Officer Police Station - Kharsiya, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. GA. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 26.09.2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner Annexure P-4 within any specified time frame in accordance with law/rules. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. Considering facts of the case, nature of relief, submissions of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending application/representation of the petitioner Annexure P/4 in accordance with relevant rule/law/regulation preferably within an outer limit of ‘30 days’ from the date of receipt of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with respect to the merit of the case. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-