Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 52385 (BOM)
PREMDEEP S/O NISHIKANT MATLANE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AKOLA AND 2 OTHERS
WP/607/2016 · 2025-01-08
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52385 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52385 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 912 wp 607.16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 607/2016 (Premdeep S/o Nishikant Matlane Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. K. Surve, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S. S. Hulke, APP for respondent/State.
CORAM: ANIL L. PANSARE AND M. M. NERLIKAR, JJ
.
DATED : 26/08/2025. Heard.
2. The learned counsel for petitioner shall remove office objection within a period of three working days. If the office objections are not removed within a period of three working days, the petition shall stand dismissed.
3. List the petition, once the office objections removed.
( M. M. NERLIKAR
, J.)
( ANIL L. PANSARE
, J.)
Gohane