Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52383 (CHH)

LAXMAN SINGH JAGAT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/9604/2025 · 2025-11-25

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:57488 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9604 of 2025 Laxman Singh Jagat S/o Rajaram Jagat, Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Bachalikhurd, P,s. Ratanpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Ratanpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ...Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Shyam Kumar, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 26.11.2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 710/2025, registered at Police Station - Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the o9ence punishable under Sections 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 2. The prosecution story in brief, is that, as per secret information receive from the informant, on the basis of said information the Police conducted raid and have seized 135 bulk liters of country RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 made liquor from the possession of the applicant. Thereafter, the crime has been registered for an o9ence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no exclusive possession of the seizure of country made liquor. He also submits that for under Section 34(2) of the Chattisgarh Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years and the applicant has no criminal antecedent and he is in jail since 28.10.2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for releasing the applicant on regular bail. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that in the present case, the charge-sheet has not been submitted till date as the investigation is still going on. He further submits that the quantity of liquor seized from the possession of the applicant i.e. 135 bulk liters of country made liquor. Hence, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the fact and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of o9ence levelled against the applicant and the fact that a huge quantity of liquor, i.e. 135 bulk liters of illegal country made liquor was seized from the possession of the applicant without any valid licence and no plausible explanation has been o9ered in this 3 regard. Furthermore, considering the gravity and seriousness of this case and it cannot be a case of false implication, this Court is of the view that it is not a @t case to enlarge the applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant Laxman Singh Jagat, involved in Crime No. 710/2025, registered at Police Station - Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the o9ence punishable under Sections 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, is rejected at this stage. 8. Needless to say that the trial Court concerned is at liberty to proceed and conclude the trial expeditiously. 9. OAce is directed to provide a certi@ed copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan